May I wish all readers of this blog all good wishes for Christmas and the New Year? I will be adding additional posts over the festive period, depending on how bored I become with eating, drinking and watching TV.
Redundancy & Redeployment
18 12 2008A recent case dealt with the obligations on an employer when making redundancies to try and redeploy “at risk” staff into “suitable alternative employment”. What does this mean though? In most consultation processes very little effort is often expended by the employer into fulfilling its obligations.
It now seems clear that ANY suitable alternative employment in the employer’s group should first be offered to an “at risk” employee before it is offered to any not-at-risk employees. Employers will inevitably argue that job x was not suitable and there will then need to follow an analysis of just how suitable or otherwise the “at-risk” employee was. It should not matter that there was a better not-at-risk candidate. Furthermore, the issue of retraining might arise and the employer could find themselves in difficulty if it failed to recognise this. For instance, an Equities Analyst covering Europe could surely move across to cover North America, if such a vacancy existed? It doesn’t seem to happen.
The upshot of this is that “at risk” employees should be preferred above all other candidates when consideration is given to filling internal vacancies. For pregnant “at risk” employees they also have an added layer of protection because she has the right to be automatically offered any suitable and appropriate vacancy.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: at risk, pregnancy, redeployment, suitable alternative employment
Categories : Redundancy
More from Alex
10 12 2008If you want a rationale for redundancy selection, look no further than the cartoon below. It doesn’t get nearer the knuckle than this,
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Redundancy
Thanks be to Alex …
10 12 2008No, I’m not talking about the Chelsea centre half but the cartoon in the Daily Telegraph. His cartoons are worth the cover price of the Telegraph alone. Witty, ascerbic and they tell you more about City life than any number of learned articles or (ahem) blogs. For instance, see the cartoon for the 27th November last;
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Redundancy
Redundancy – know your rights!
6 12 2008Judging from the traffic on this site, redundancy is the big employment law issue at the moment and not surprisingly given the current climate. 1,000 job losses announced this week at Nomura, 650 at Credit Suisse and that on top of the losses at Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers. In my day job I am seeing plenty of people from investment banks and beyond, all with concerns and queries about either being told they’ve been selected for redundancy or are at risk. If you’re one of those people what do you need to know?
1. Are you an employee? Most employment protection legislation (apart from that involving discrimination issues) only covers employees and not self-employed people, for instance.
2. How long have you been continuously employed by your employer? To be able to claim a redundancy payment you need two years continuous employment experience. If you have this then you are entitled to be paid a “statutory redundancy payment” (SRP) in addition to your notice monies. SRP is not generous – £330 per complete year of service if you’re between 22-41 and £495 if you’re over 41. Your notice entitlement will be as set out in your contract of employment or as stipulated by the Employment Rights Act 1996 – basically 1 week per year of service up to a maximum of twelve weeks (four weeks notice minimum to be given by the employer once the employee has one month’s service).
3. If you have more than one year’s continuous employment experience then you have acquired the right not to be unfairly dismissed. This is a big topic but, in brief, it may allow you to argue that your selection for redundancy was unfair.
4. Have you been discriminated against? There are six main grounds for discrimination – race, sex, age, disability, religious belief and sexual orientation in addition to other grouds such as being subject to less favourable treatment because of being a fixed time or part-time worker. In addition whistleblowing is another type of claim that might be available. Remember it is your role that needs to be redundant, not you. What will happen to the work you do once you’ve left?
5. Most of the employees I see have been given a compromise agreement by their employer and they need an independent solicitor to advise them on their legal rights under the agreement. I have written elsewhere in this blog on compromise agreements and the issues they raise – see the page headed “compromise agreements” on the tab at the head of this blog for more information. One main reason why employers offer compromise agreements is that they want the employee to waive their rights to sue for unfair dismissal, discrimination, breach of contract etc. This is particularly the case if the employer is offering an enhanced package (in the City this is often, but not always, one month’s full pay per year of service).
6. If you have been given a compromise agreement then you will need to have it reviewed by a solicitor; give me a call if you want me to help. If you are unhappy about your selection or want further advice, get to see a solicitor and get some advice.
7. It is always helpful when seeing a new client to see the contract of employment, all correspondence relating to the redundancy situation and, of course, the compromise agreement.
Please call me on 0207 464 8433 or email me at michaelscutt@dalelangley.co.uk if I can help you at all.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: compromise agreements, credit suisse, discrimination, goldman sachs, nomura, Redundancy, unfair dismissal
Categories : Redundancy
Beware Festive Cheer (or what not to do at the Office Christmas Party)
5 12 2008Now that Christmas is in three weeks time it seems appropriate to repeat my annual warnings about the perils of enjoying the office Christmas party too much (assuming, of course, that your employer is still holding one).
Christmas parties can get out of hand and everyone comes to regret it afterwards. Work rules apply at the Christmas party as much as in the office, which is why actions or comments (which inevitably occur after too much alcohol has been consumed) often end in tears for all concerned. For this reason many companies choose not to hold an annual bash to avoid all the accompanying aggro. I had a good laugh when I hear about a friend of a friend of a friend (and not a client I should emphasise) who got so drunk one year that she flashed her breasts at her boss; the next year she merely got so drunk she had to be taken home. She hasn’t been invited to the Party this year. In another example, from some years ago, a woman (again not a client) slept with her boss after the party and then, in January, found she was selected for redundancy.
It’s not all about drunkenness and sex though. In one case, an employee who resigned and claimed constructive dismissal because his employers failed to honour the substantial pay rise promised to him at the Christmas party by his line manager lost his case. It was held the promise had not been intended to create a legally binding obligation.
Remember, office rules apply at the Christmas Party.
If you’ve any more examples of office party howlers please feel free to leave a comment below.
This article will appear in the Docklands and Peninsula newpapers week commencing 8th December
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Uncategorized